One difference is that research progresses in incremental steps through multiple closely related publications. But the situation is different in science, technology, engineering and mathematics fields. To humanities scholars, this situation might seem nonsensical you wouldn’t need a computer to tell you if you’d plagiarized another writer or inappropriately reused your own material. Now that Duke had adopted the software, those in attendance were encouraged to use it to check their manuscripts and grants for plagiarism and self-plagiarism prior to submission. Many scientific journals and major granting agencies, we were told, are also using iThenticate. A dean from the graduate school then spoke about the plagiarism-detection platform iThenticate, which compares submitted papers against published papers and identifies passages that are identical or nearly so. It began with an overview that included material on self-plagiarism: the reuse of an author’s previously published material. In 2019, the Office of Scientific Integrity at our institution, Duke University, held a town hall meeting on plagiarism.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |